"/>

国产精品99一区二区三_免费中文日韩_国产在线精品一区二区_日本成人手机在线

Spotlight: India debates over holding simultaneous polls for Union, states
Source: Xinhua   2018-02-04 18:00:10

by Pankaj Yadav

NEW DELHI, Feb. 4 (Xinhua) -- Debate has started in Indian political circles as the country goes to the general elections in 2019.

Three days prior to flying to Davos on Jan. 22 to participate in the World Economic Forum, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a TV interview strongly advocated the idea of holding simultaneous elections at the Centre and in all the states.

This, he said, will save a lot of money and also let the politicians focus on works for full five years without being disturbed by elections, which have lately become a round-the-year event in India.

On an average, as many as five Indian states go to polls every year. Whenever the states go to polls, it becomes a slugfest between the ruling and the opposition parties. As all resources are diverted to the polls, governance and development works take a back seat during such times.

For the first 20 years since India gained Independence in 1947, elections were held simultaneously for the parliament and all state legislatures. This was so because the polls held in that era gave a decisive verdict to the then ruling party.

The first four simultaneous elections for Centre and states were held in 1951, 1957, 1962 and 1967. But slowly that trend disappeared and frequent mid-term polls were witnessed.

This trend of holding elections at different times for different states, and the Centre, has been there for almost five decades now. More so since the late 1990s, an era which saw many government changes at the Centre and multiple parliamentary elections held over a span of four years. The government headed by former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1996 lasted only for 13 days.

Hence comes forth this proposal of holding simultaneous elections in both states and at the Centre. The idea gained significance especially after reiteration by Modi on Jan. 19. Though there are valid arguments cited against the idea too.

Supporting the idea per se, Dr Jaswant Singh, a political analyst in Delhi, said that it's a good idea if implemented.

"Just like in the United States and in other countries where federal and provincial elections are held simultaneously, we can also think of adopting the idea," he said.

Toeing the prime minister's line, senior leader of the country's main ruling party the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Bhupendra Yadav said holding simultaneous elections will ensure "consistency, continuity and governance." But this would need amendment to the country's Constitution and electoral laws.

Presenting a diagonally opposite argument, the country's former Election Commission chief S.Y. Quraishi said the idea of holding simultaneous elections was very much "against the spirit of the Constitution and federalism."

Citing practical difficulties, he said that suppose simultaneous elections are held but the government loses its majority in the parliament, it will be difficult to hold a new set of elections in all the states.

Referring to the famous example of former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee heading a government for 13 days only in 1996, he asked:"Why should the states suffer for the electoral decisions taken at the Centre?"

National and local issues are different, and holding simultaneous elections is likely to blur judgment, he added.

Editor: Yamei
Related News
Xinhuanet

Spotlight: India debates over holding simultaneous polls for Union, states

Source: Xinhua 2018-02-04 18:00:10
[Editor: huaxia]

by Pankaj Yadav

NEW DELHI, Feb. 4 (Xinhua) -- Debate has started in Indian political circles as the country goes to the general elections in 2019.

Three days prior to flying to Davos on Jan. 22 to participate in the World Economic Forum, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a TV interview strongly advocated the idea of holding simultaneous elections at the Centre and in all the states.

This, he said, will save a lot of money and also let the politicians focus on works for full five years without being disturbed by elections, which have lately become a round-the-year event in India.

On an average, as many as five Indian states go to polls every year. Whenever the states go to polls, it becomes a slugfest between the ruling and the opposition parties. As all resources are diverted to the polls, governance and development works take a back seat during such times.

For the first 20 years since India gained Independence in 1947, elections were held simultaneously for the parliament and all state legislatures. This was so because the polls held in that era gave a decisive verdict to the then ruling party.

The first four simultaneous elections for Centre and states were held in 1951, 1957, 1962 and 1967. But slowly that trend disappeared and frequent mid-term polls were witnessed.

This trend of holding elections at different times for different states, and the Centre, has been there for almost five decades now. More so since the late 1990s, an era which saw many government changes at the Centre and multiple parliamentary elections held over a span of four years. The government headed by former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1996 lasted only for 13 days.

Hence comes forth this proposal of holding simultaneous elections in both states and at the Centre. The idea gained significance especially after reiteration by Modi on Jan. 19. Though there are valid arguments cited against the idea too.

Supporting the idea per se, Dr Jaswant Singh, a political analyst in Delhi, said that it's a good idea if implemented.

"Just like in the United States and in other countries where federal and provincial elections are held simultaneously, we can also think of adopting the idea," he said.

Toeing the prime minister's line, senior leader of the country's main ruling party the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Bhupendra Yadav said holding simultaneous elections will ensure "consistency, continuity and governance." But this would need amendment to the country's Constitution and electoral laws.

Presenting a diagonally opposite argument, the country's former Election Commission chief S.Y. Quraishi said the idea of holding simultaneous elections was very much "against the spirit of the Constitution and federalism."

Citing practical difficulties, he said that suppose simultaneous elections are held but the government loses its majority in the parliament, it will be difficult to hold a new set of elections in all the states.

Referring to the famous example of former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee heading a government for 13 days only in 1996, he asked:"Why should the states suffer for the electoral decisions taken at the Centre?"

National and local issues are different, and holding simultaneous elections is likely to blur judgment, he added.

[Editor: huaxia]
010020070750000000000000011103261369484731
主站蜘蛛池模板: 晴隆县| 华蓥市| 兰西县| 武宣县| 鄢陵县| 屏山县| 冷水江市| 湖北省| 高淳县| 伊宁县| 花垣县| 陆丰市| 逊克县| 松原市| 德安县| 客服| 穆棱市| 营口市| 海口市| 宁城县| 墨脱县| 岳西县| 兴业县| 嫩江县| 凯里市| 凉城县| 南开区| 琼结县| 隆林| 南昌市| 喀喇沁旗| 久治县| 宜阳县| 高邑县| 库尔勒市| 措美县| 碌曲县| 屯门区| 浪卡子县| 玉山县| 宽甸|