"/>

国产精品99一区二区三_免费中文日韩_国产在线精品一区二区_日本成人手机在线

Spotlight: India debates over holding simultaneous polls for Union, states
Source: Xinhua   2018-02-04 18:00:10

by Pankaj Yadav

NEW DELHI, Feb. 4 (Xinhua) -- Debate has started in Indian political circles as the country goes to the general elections in 2019.

Three days prior to flying to Davos on Jan. 22 to participate in the World Economic Forum, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a TV interview strongly advocated the idea of holding simultaneous elections at the Centre and in all the states.

This, he said, will save a lot of money and also let the politicians focus on works for full five years without being disturbed by elections, which have lately become a round-the-year event in India.

On an average, as many as five Indian states go to polls every year. Whenever the states go to polls, it becomes a slugfest between the ruling and the opposition parties. As all resources are diverted to the polls, governance and development works take a back seat during such times.

For the first 20 years since India gained Independence in 1947, elections were held simultaneously for the parliament and all state legislatures. This was so because the polls held in that era gave a decisive verdict to the then ruling party.

The first four simultaneous elections for Centre and states were held in 1951, 1957, 1962 and 1967. But slowly that trend disappeared and frequent mid-term polls were witnessed.

This trend of holding elections at different times for different states, and the Centre, has been there for almost five decades now. More so since the late 1990s, an era which saw many government changes at the Centre and multiple parliamentary elections held over a span of four years. The government headed by former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1996 lasted only for 13 days.

Hence comes forth this proposal of holding simultaneous elections in both states and at the Centre. The idea gained significance especially after reiteration by Modi on Jan. 19. Though there are valid arguments cited against the idea too.

Supporting the idea per se, Dr Jaswant Singh, a political analyst in Delhi, said that it's a good idea if implemented.

"Just like in the United States and in other countries where federal and provincial elections are held simultaneously, we can also think of adopting the idea," he said.

Toeing the prime minister's line, senior leader of the country's main ruling party the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Bhupendra Yadav said holding simultaneous elections will ensure "consistency, continuity and governance." But this would need amendment to the country's Constitution and electoral laws.

Presenting a diagonally opposite argument, the country's former Election Commission chief S.Y. Quraishi said the idea of holding simultaneous elections was very much "against the spirit of the Constitution and federalism."

Citing practical difficulties, he said that suppose simultaneous elections are held but the government loses its majority in the parliament, it will be difficult to hold a new set of elections in all the states.

Referring to the famous example of former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee heading a government for 13 days only in 1996, he asked:"Why should the states suffer for the electoral decisions taken at the Centre?"

National and local issues are different, and holding simultaneous elections is likely to blur judgment, he added.

Editor: Yamei
Related News
Xinhuanet

Spotlight: India debates over holding simultaneous polls for Union, states

Source: Xinhua 2018-02-04 18:00:10
[Editor: huaxia]

by Pankaj Yadav

NEW DELHI, Feb. 4 (Xinhua) -- Debate has started in Indian political circles as the country goes to the general elections in 2019.

Three days prior to flying to Davos on Jan. 22 to participate in the World Economic Forum, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a TV interview strongly advocated the idea of holding simultaneous elections at the Centre and in all the states.

This, he said, will save a lot of money and also let the politicians focus on works for full five years without being disturbed by elections, which have lately become a round-the-year event in India.

On an average, as many as five Indian states go to polls every year. Whenever the states go to polls, it becomes a slugfest between the ruling and the opposition parties. As all resources are diverted to the polls, governance and development works take a back seat during such times.

For the first 20 years since India gained Independence in 1947, elections were held simultaneously for the parliament and all state legislatures. This was so because the polls held in that era gave a decisive verdict to the then ruling party.

The first four simultaneous elections for Centre and states were held in 1951, 1957, 1962 and 1967. But slowly that trend disappeared and frequent mid-term polls were witnessed.

This trend of holding elections at different times for different states, and the Centre, has been there for almost five decades now. More so since the late 1990s, an era which saw many government changes at the Centre and multiple parliamentary elections held over a span of four years. The government headed by former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1996 lasted only for 13 days.

Hence comes forth this proposal of holding simultaneous elections in both states and at the Centre. The idea gained significance especially after reiteration by Modi on Jan. 19. Though there are valid arguments cited against the idea too.

Supporting the idea per se, Dr Jaswant Singh, a political analyst in Delhi, said that it's a good idea if implemented.

"Just like in the United States and in other countries where federal and provincial elections are held simultaneously, we can also think of adopting the idea," he said.

Toeing the prime minister's line, senior leader of the country's main ruling party the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Bhupendra Yadav said holding simultaneous elections will ensure "consistency, continuity and governance." But this would need amendment to the country's Constitution and electoral laws.

Presenting a diagonally opposite argument, the country's former Election Commission chief S.Y. Quraishi said the idea of holding simultaneous elections was very much "against the spirit of the Constitution and federalism."

Citing practical difficulties, he said that suppose simultaneous elections are held but the government loses its majority in the parliament, it will be difficult to hold a new set of elections in all the states.

Referring to the famous example of former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee heading a government for 13 days only in 1996, he asked:"Why should the states suffer for the electoral decisions taken at the Centre?"

National and local issues are different, and holding simultaneous elections is likely to blur judgment, he added.

[Editor: huaxia]
010020070750000000000000011103261369484731
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乐平市| 筠连县| 上饶县| 建湖县| 湘西| 霍山县| 竹山县| 莱州市| 黄石市| 虞城县| 长兴县| 长治市| 南木林县| 双流县| 新乡县| 博客| 从江县| 中江县| 奎屯市| 尚志市| 绥阳县| 武清区| 京山县| 丁青县| 天气| 榆社县| 东城区| 广饶县| 金坛市| 吉首市| 东至县| 库伦旗| 靖宇县| 吉林省| 克什克腾旗| 吉木萨尔县| 汨罗市| 民丰县| 资中县| 文成县| 维西|